Hi ,
Unable to do Post good receipt for the Sales returns from the customer . Created Sales Orders for returns , created delivery and when trying to do PGR receives the following message .
' Change the inspection stock of material XXXXXXXXXin QM only '
And No inspection lot or the material stock seen in the system. please advice.
Dear Team,
This is my requirement as below.
For recurring inspection, lot generally creates before 21 days of the
date of expiry
When there is only one batch available, PPC cannot issue the material to
shop
Hence when a lot is created by the system for recurring inspection only
sample stock to be moved under quality and the remaining qty. should be
in unrestricted location so that the stock can be issued.
When the lot is rejected in the retest, auto mail should be generated
stating all the details to all the concerned personnel.
whether it is possiable in Standard SAP or not. If it is possiable tell me the process.
it is urgent.
Regards,
Ani
Hi
Good morning.
I am working on SAP QM/PM. I have created a quality notification through QM01 with stability study type. The maintenance plan and inspection lots were generated. But when I try to restart the schedule through IP10, again three more inspection lots are generated for every 3 months. Can you please tell me the reason for this ASAP?
Thanks in advance
Rachana
Dear Expert,
In Inspection Plan we have activated all MICs with long term inspection indicator, then we forcefully completed result recording by selecting forcefull selection button (status to 5) then we have done UD and now system status change to UD ICCO SPCO STUP and If again need to change the result we need to come to UD change, Edit >Reset > Inspection Completion.
Do we have any other option to record the result without changing UD change status i.e going to Edit>Reset>Inspection Completion.
Thanks
Hello,
I am getting dump after entering/saving the Task code in an existing notification.
I created a follow-up action and assigned this in the follow-up Action column of a Task code.
I have added this code in the Tasks... I want to achieve, when user enter a specific task, system trigger the email !!!
I am not sure whether we need to implement some sap note or I have missing something in config.
Please suggest !
Error analysis
An exception occurred that is explained in detail below.
The exception, which is assigned to class 'CX_SY_DYN_CALL_PARAM_MISSING', was not caught in
procedure "IQS1_UPDATE_FOLLOW_UP_ACTIONS" "(FUNCTION)", nor was it propagated by a RAISING clause.
Since the caller of the procedure could not have anticipated that the exception would occur, the current program is terminated.
The reason for the exception is:
When calling the function module "QM06_FM_TASK_SEND_PAPER_ATTACH", one of the parameters
needed according to the interface description was not specified.
This parameter was "I_CUSTOMIZING".
How to correct the error
If the error occures in a non-modified SAP program, you may be able to find an interim solution in an SAP Note.
If you have access to SAP Notes, carry out a search with the following keywords:
"CALL_FUNCTION_PARM_MISSING" "CX_SY_DYN_CALL_PARAM_MISSING"
"SAPLIQS1" or "LIQS1U11"
"IQS1_UPDATE_FOLLOW_UP_ACTIONS"
Regards,
Jat
Dear experts,
I'm a noob in the QM area. Could you please recommend some docs, howto's, links in term of introduction in the topics like:
- QM for goods receipts
- Inspection lot calculation
- Inspection catalog
- Vendor management in term of QM
I really would apreciate it.
Thank very much in advance.
BR
Denis
Dears,
i have requirement that user wants a report in which he can see MICs results generated by In process inspection and its related final inspection.
for example he has a material 12345678, during production he did in process inspection. after conformation he did 04 inspection. now on 1 report he wants results of 03 and its corresponding 04 inspections. is there any way we can link 2.
Regards
Dear Team,
I could not able to understand the difference between Master Inspection Characteristic (MIC) created in t.code QS21 & Control Plan (CP) being created in QPCP transaction. Could anyone guide me on the below.
1. What is difference between MIC & CP?
2. On what kind of business scenarios MIC & CP will be created?
3. How to assign CP in routing / reference operation set?
Thanks
Would there be any impact by Inspection plan which has been created with later date as validity date than the Purchase Order, production order etc.,
similarly if the MIC also has been created on a later date than the Purchase order and production etc., what kind of impact, will it causes an error during QM Inspection production...
Pl. help to understand.
regards,
Dear experts, I am building up a very simple custom workflow solution for quality notifications based upon business rules/logic (background: we just decided not to use the standard SAP workflow). The logic has been implemented in QQMA0014 in order to determine whether a new task should be created or not for the notification.
In order to achieve the requirement we planned to use the following standard function modules:
BAPI_QUALNOT_ADD_DATA (used to add new task)
BAPI_QUALNOT_SAVE (save the changes made to the notification)
BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT (commit changes on database)
BAPI_QUALNOT_CHANGETSKSTAT (used to release the task)
BAPI_QUALNOT_SAVE (save the changes made to the notification)
BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT (commit changes on database)
And so we decided to create a Z function module with all above mentioned BAPIs that could be called from QQMA0014 and executed in the update task after notification save. The problem is that SAP does not allow explicit commit work commands when the Z function module is executed in the update task, meaning that I cannot release the newly created task because the BAPI_QUALNOT_CHANGETSKSTAT will not find it in the database.
Any ideas how to solve the problem? Your inputs will be highly appreciated.
Cheers, Julio.
Hi Gurus, while creating QM notification for customer complaint, The complaint quantity is populating in RKMNG and BZMNG automatically.
I want them to initialize the field and let user enter exact complaint quantity. As this updates automatically, user often misses this and saves with wrong complaint quantity.
please advise if you get the solution
Regards
CR
Hello QM Experts,
I am an SD consultant and need an urgent help on a QM issue . Your valuable inputs is needed in order to go ahead with our UAT testing.
Scenario : We are dong a subcontracting scenario where we drop ship the material from supplier end to the end customer . In this process we initially do a GR at our plant for the sample lot before asking the supplier to use the same lot to ship to the customer based on the inspection results. The warehouse team record these results against the lot number for that material.
Issue : when warehouse does a virtual GR for the actual shipment and trying to record the results the system is again proposing a new lot number Ideally the system is not expected to create a new lot since the actual GR was done against the samples and QM results recorded.
Current inspection set up in the material master data : ( Z01 ( Inspection of GR on a PO & Z02 - Inspection for Production order) ).
I would like to know what setting is needed to stop the system from creating a new inspection lot while recording the inspection results doing a virtual GR . Please help me out here.
Thanks
Sai
Hello,
We have a scenario where we do GR for the same material and same batch twice . It's a subcontracting scenario and the material is drop shipped from supplier to end customer . We do GR & inspection for samples (physically) the first time when the system generates a inspection lot number. The second time we do a GR, it's a virtual GR for the same batch and the system is not expected to generate new inspection lot number . How can I achieve this . We have assigned inspection type 01 ( against PO) and 02 ( against production order) against the material in the inspection set up of MM. Please help me out here .
Thanks
Sai
HI EXPERT:
I'm working on QM result record using bapi:BAPI_INSPOPER_RECORDRESULTS (SINGLE_RESULTS).
we write serial number to field EXT_NO.then commit it success. After that we make UD for inspection lot.
My problem is I found no record of serial number in this inspection lot. ,and ,no record in table SER04 and OBJK
When we use TCODE :qe11 to record result .The serial number will be update to table ser04.
My data:
material plt data 2 view:
serial number profile(QMSL AND MMSL)
Quality view:
Inspection plan:
External Numbering of Units to be Inspected=3
I guess someting wrong with Bapi ,hope someone know it.
thanks
Tony
Hi Experts,
Could you please help on this.
1. There are some inspection lots created from process order . Now the inspection lots are having REL, SPRQ status, but there is no stock existing in quality inspection mentioned in the inspection lot. Process order is also in TECO status.
Now i am unable to cancel the inspection lot in QA02 and QA32 tcode. The option is greyed out. Also not able to do the UD for the inspection lots. It is showing error " deficit ba stock."
I want to cancel the inspection lot to set status LTCA. could you please help on this.
I want to clarify if it is possible to have the author field BUNAME-QMEL in the subject tab of a Q2 notification. I have checked the screen areas 035-037 and have found Vendor and Manufacturer only.
The author appears in the Q3 notification . Please confirm if this is correct. Thank you
Hello Experts
My question is posed from a QM perspective for an MM issue. I've read many of the postings herein as well as the SAP documentation to no avail regarding my question.
I have a batch in which SLED has expired.
I have a batch which is within SLED but is now sales obsolete.
The issue is not SLED, but material being obsolete. I'd like to change these batch numbers and include a suffix such as OB. Here in the forum movements seem to be the easy way but this for me is not an option. I do not want to move it via MB1B/MIGO. I cannot use movement reasons such as 551 and others. Please suggest how to accomplish this.
Much Thanks
Verroz
We are mass migrating the Inspection plans to a different landscape, and I have so far migrated the inspection plans successfully,
However, I am having issues with migrating of the Q-Levels on Characteristics .
Interestingly when the Dynamic Modification on the task header is 3 (on the characteristic level ) other than without "skipped lots", the Quality Levels are migrated. However, when the combination of Dynamic modification rule 3 with "skip Lots", they don't migrate over.
Does that mean anytime the task header has "skip lot" they NEVER get migrated? I don't believe so..
Please advise.
Dear all,
I am doing quality rejection using different UD code, I need to report/tables where i can get rejection according to UD code,
please help.
Dear all,
I would like to know if there is any possibility to ge the "Actual lot quantity" in the "reference quantity" field of a Non Conformity Notification created automatically after keying a bad result for a production inspection lot.
In fact, I get the quantity of the production order released in the "Ref. Quantity" field of my notification when I would want to get the quantity of production order that has been confirmed/delivered. Is there any way to do that ?
Thank you for your kind help.
Jason